Construction and Demolition Waste: Difference between revisions
m minor text change |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Tonnage & Waste Types]] | [[Category:Tonnage & Waste Types]][[Category:Targets & Metrics]] | ||
[[Construction and Demolition Waste]] ([[C&D Waste]]) | [[Construction and Demolition Waste]] ([[C&D Waste]]) is defined as "waste generated by construction and demolition activities" <ref>defined within Directive 2018/851 amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste (the [[Waste Framework Directive]])</ref>. [[Construction, Demolition and Excavation waste (mining waste)]] ([[CD&E Waste]]) includes excavation materials. | ||
Under the [[Waste Framework Directive]] there is a target to for the [[Recovery]] of non-hazardous C&D waste of 70% by 2020, which the UK is currently meeting even taking into consideration the high level of uncertainty around the absolute tonnage figures. The large proportion of this waste is used as a [[Secondary Aggregate]] in construction. The figures for England and the UK are extracted in the table below from the [[DEFRA]] Digest | [[DEFRA]] statistics published in July 2021 show that there was 67.8 million tonnes of [[C&D Waste]] generated in 2018, with the addition of excavation waste taking the total [[CD&E Waste]] generated in the UK in 2018 to 137.8 million tonnes, with a further 14.8 million tonnes of mining waste<ref name='ref1'>[https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/uk-waste-data UK Statistics on Waste - May 2022 update]</ref>. | ||
Under the [[Waste Framework Directive]] there is a target to for the [[Recovery]] of non-hazardous C&D waste of 70% by 2020, which the UK is currently meeting even taking into consideration the high level of uncertainty around the absolute tonnage figures. The large proportion of this waste is used as a [[Secondary Aggregate]] in construction. The figures for England and the UK are extracted in the table below from the [[DEFRA]] Digest for [[C&D Waste]]<ref name='ref1'/> | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+ style="caption-side:bottom;"|C&D Waste Recovery Rates 2010- | |+ style="caption-side:bottom;"|C&D Waste Recovery Rates 2010-18 (reported to 2020 for England) | ||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan="3" | !! colspan="3" | UK !! colspan="3" | England | ! rowspan="3" | !! colspan="3" | UK !! colspan="3" | England | ||
| Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
| 2011 || style="text-align:center;" | 60.2 || style="text-align:center;" | 55.0 || style="text-align:center;" | 91.4% || style="text-align:center;" | 54.9 || style="text-align:center;" | 50.8 || style="text-align:center;" | 92.5% | | 2011 || style="text-align:center;" | 60.2 || style="text-align:center;" | 55.0 || style="text-align:center;" | 91.4% || style="text-align:center;" | 54.9 || style="text-align:center;" | 50.8 || style="text-align:center;" | 92.5% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2012 || style="text-align:center;" | 55.8 || style="text-align:center;" | 50.8 || style="text-align:center;" | 91. | | 2012 || style="text-align:center;" | 55.8 || style="text-align:center;" | 50.8 || style="text-align:center;" | 91.1% || style="text-align:center;" | 50.5 || style="text-align:center;" | 46.4 || style="text-align:center;" | 92.0% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2013 || style="text-align:center;" | 57.1 || style="text-align:center;" | 52.0 || style="text-align:center;" | 91.2% || style="text-align:center;" | 51.7 || style="text-align:center;" | 47.6 || style="text-align:center;" | 92.0% | | 2013 || style="text-align:center;" | 57.1 || style="text-align:center;" | 52.0 || style="text-align:center;" | 91.2% || style="text-align:center;" | 51.7 || style="text-align:center;" | 47.6 || style="text-align:center;" | 92.0% | ||
| Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
| 2014 || style="text-align:center;" | 61.5 || style="text-align:center;" | 56.3 || style="text-align:center;" | 91.5% || style="text-align:center;" | 55.9 || style="text-align:center;" | 51.7 || style="text-align:center;" | 92.4% | | 2014 || style="text-align:center;" | 61.5 || style="text-align:center;" | 56.3 || style="text-align:center;" | 91.5% || style="text-align:center;" | 55.9 || style="text-align:center;" | 51.7 || style="text-align:center;" | 92.4% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2015 || style="text-align:center;" | 63.8 || style="text-align:center;" | 58. | | 2015 || style="text-align:center;" | 63.8 || style="text-align:center;" | 58.0 || style="text-align:center;" | 91.0% || style="text-align:center;" | 57.7 || style="text-align:center;" | 53.3 || style="text-align:center;" | 92.3% | ||
|- | |||
| 2016 || style="text-align:center;" | 66.2 || style="text-align:center;" | 60.0 || style="text-align:center;" | 91.7% || style="text-align:center;" | 59.6 || style="text-align:center;" | 55.0 || style="text-align:center;" | 92.1% | |||
|- | |||
| 2017 || style="text-align:center;" | 68.7 || style="text-align:center;" | 63.0 || style="text-align:center;" | 91.5% || style="text-align:center;" | 62.2 || style="text-align:center;" | 57.9 || style="text-align:center;" | 93.1% | |||
|- | |||
| 2018 || style="text-align:center;" | 67.8 || style="text-align:center;" | 62.6 || style="text-align:center;" | 92.3% || style="text-align:center;" | 61.4 || style="text-align:center;" | 57.5 || style="text-align:center;" | 93.8% | |||
|- | |||
|2019||- ||- ||-|| style="text-align:center;" |62.3||style="text-align:center;" |58.3||style="text-align:center;" |93.6% | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |2020||- ||- ||-||style="text-align:center;" |53.6 ||style="text-align:center;" |50.0||style="text-align:center;" |93.2% | ||
|} | |} | ||
== References == | == References == | ||