Collection System Design: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
This latter point has led to two types of arrangements being implemented across the country for the collection of [[Green Waste]]
This latter point has led to two types of arrangements being implemented across the country for the collection of [[Green Waste]]


* '''Free Collection or [[Green Not Charged]]''' - Most authorities initially did not charge their residents for the collection of their [[Green Waste]] and those that continue to provide the service with no charge/fee, do so either becuase of a  political reluctance to charge and/or a perception that a charge would lead to a drop in recycling figures or a political desire to retain their position as a 'high achieving recycling authority'.
* '''Free Collection or [[Green Not Charged]]''' - Most authorities initially did not charge their residents for the collection of their [[Green Waste]] and those that continue to provide the service with no charge/fee, do so either because of a  political reluctance to charge and/or a perception that a charge would lead to a drop in recycling figures or a political desire to retain their position as a 'high achieving recycling authority'.
* '''Charged Collection or [[Green Charged]]''' - Many authorities have moved to a charged system, mainly driven by a desire to recover the cost of collection from those that use it the most, but also due to the perception that free collection leads to an increase in collected waste and a reduction in, for example, home composting.
* '''Charged Collection or [[Green Charged]]''' - Many authorities have moved to a charged system, mainly driven by a desire to recover the cost of collection from those that use it the most, but also due to the perception that free collection leads to an increase in collected waste and a reduction in, for example, home composting.